Unknown's avatar

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am an experienced reliability engineering and management consultant with FMS Reliability, a consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the organization, to assist other organizations. Given the scope of my work, I am considered an international authority on reliability engineering. My passion is working with teams to improve product reliability, customer satisfaction, and efficiencies in product development; and to reduce product risk and warranty costs. I have a Bachelor of Science in Physics from the United States Military Academy and a Master of Science in Statistics from Stanford University.

Take Action to Deal with Part Obsolescence


Dealing with Parts Obsolescence

NOTE: This is the last post directly from this site. I’m moving this blog to accendoreliability.com/creprep/

If you subscribe to this blog via WordPress directly, and there about 150 of you, this is the last blog post you will receive.

Please join the Mailchimp based email list, CRE Preparation email list, today, to avoid missing any of the weekly articles/tutorials.

Also, considering becoming a member of Accendo Reliability where you will find a broad array of reliability engineering professional development material.


Even products with relatively quick design cycles and short stays in the market deal with part obsolescence.

Long design periods along with long durations in service or in production simple increases the chance that one or more parts will become obsolete. Continue reading

Identifying Parts Obsolescence Early


Parts Obsolescence Management an Ongoing Problem

One aspect of creating a new product or system is the sourcing of parts, components, and materials.

Gone are the days of your organization providing every element of the final product. Henry Ford’s supply chain for early Ford automobiles include their own forests, rubber plantations, and iron ore mines. [Gelderman, 1981]

We increasing rely on the supply chain to create the necessary parts for the design’s functionality. Then to continue to supply those same parts for decades, in some cases. Continue reading

Software Reuse Considerations


Software Reuse Considerations

Note: I’m moving this blog to Accendo Reliability under the articles menu. This series of articles or short tutorials will continue to have a unique mailing list. This series addresses many fundamental concepts and tasks for reliability professionals and will support the wider range of articles, webinars, podcasts, and courses found on Accendo Reliability.

In the next week or so, I will complete the transfer of past articles to Accendo Reliability and setup a redirect for all existing links here to the corresponding location on the Accendo site. Please update your bookmarks. Also let me know if anything is missing or needs attention as this transition occurs.

Software elements of a product or system take time to create. Thus re-using blocks of code developed for previous applications may save on development time. Continue reading

Material Selection and Reliability


Material Selection and Reliability

Physical products are made up of materials. The materials including metals, polymers, adhesives, and many others experience loads and stresses during assembly, transport, storage, and use. Selecting the right materials such that they both meet the needs of the customer and are sufficiently reliability relies on understanding how the material will respond to the applied stresses over time. Continue reading

DFX as an Approach


Design for X as an approach

When products were crafted one at a time, the design and manufacturing process were often done by the same person. The craftsman would design and build a chest of drawers or carriage.

Some trades would employ apprentices to learn the craft, which included design. Larger project may include an architect or lead designer along with a team of engineers. Yet the shop or site for the railroad engineer or bridge was not far allowing close communication between the ironsmith and design team. Continue reading

Descriptive Models of the Design Process


Descriptive Models of the Design Process

I’ve often said, “reliability occurs at the point of decision.”

At the point of design during the design process. At each and every decision.

The design team of engineers establish the bulk of the reliability capability early in the design process. The teams decisions about materials or shape, concerning inventions or outsourcing, about how and where to build the product, and many more decision impact the final product’s reliability performance. Reliability is designed into the product right from the start.

As a reliability engineer, you cannot be present nor discuss every decision during the design process. You cannot highlight the merits of each decision often carried out alone by the designer. You can understand the designer’s process and work to influence the myriad of decisions. You can create guidelines and information that design teams can use to inform their decisions.

A Simple Descriptive Model

Nigel Cross in Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design explore how design engineers go about the task of creating a new product. He outlines various descriptive models of the design process, starting with a simple four stage model.

  1. Exploration — grappling with the problem, working to fully understand the problem definition
  2. Generation — starts with potential solution concepts, maybe many of them
  3. Evaluation — sort and revise acceptable solutions to the problem, iterates with Generation step
  4. Communication — drawings, plans, details, specifications, etc.

This is different than how a scientist or reliability engineer would approach a problem. See Understanding the Design Process for more information on the differences in problem solving approaches. Here we need to be aware that during a design process if the decisions made along the way include a well formed set of boundaries concerning product reliability, the decision are more likely to create a solutions that will meet the reliability objectives.

Michael Joseph French is his book, Conceptual Design for Engineers described a detailed model of the design process. In includes the following tasks:

  • Analysis of Problem —articulating the Need into a Statement of Problem
  • Conceptual design — transforming the Statement of Problem into Selected Schemes
  • Embodiment of Schemes — exploring and refining the Selected Schemes to select solution for Detailing
  • Detailing — create drawings, instructions, specifications for the solution to meet the Need

 

French's-Design-Process-ModelThe process starts with the recognition of a need

The initial analysis is a refinement of the need and an important step in the overall process

The statement of the problem should include three elements: a formal statement of the problem (goal), limitations for the solution (constraints), and excellence criterion (criteria).

The conceptual design stage pushes designers to create solutions in the form of schemes. In this phase the designer makes the most important decisions concerning the solution and it’s eventual reliability performance. The designer balances engineering science and knowledge, production methods, and business requirements to form potential solutions.

The crafted schemes on the first iteration may be little more then concept sketches. With iteration of the evaluation steps the schemes become refined and one scheme eventually becomes the path a new product.

The embodiment stage includes greater detail for the various proposed solutions, plus an eventual selection of a scheme to craft the product upon. The results of this stage is a set of general arrangement drawings or a draft product requirements document.

Detailing as the name implies is the detailed design and engineering work to finalize the essential remaining points of the design. For the reliability engineer this is the step where design engineers make decisions concerning production methods and specifications, both impacting process capability.

The result of the design process is a set of instructions, drawings, schematics, etc., that permit the assembly and delivery of the product to fill the customer’s need.

Summary

The primary work is done by design engineers with the aide of many within the organization. The initial steps to define the problem include the questions concerning product operating environment and expected longevity. As the schemes take shape, the initial reliability evaluations influence the refinement of the reliability goals and constraints. During the final steps the reliability engineer works closely with the design team to identify and resolve potential/actual reliability issues with the design, supplied components, and production process.

Design for Assembly


Design for Assembly

The ability to assembly a system to meet the functional requirements is constrained by the design, the materials, and the tolerances. Some designs are impossible to assembly. While other designs take little effort to build. The discipline of design for assembly, DFA, applied during the design process can enhance the manufacturing process. Continue reading