Timeline for Yet another dynamic array design in C
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 17:04 | comment | added | Ilian Zapryanov | Good suggestions. Also I am thinking how convinient would be to make a dynamic array of that dynamic array, guess I will play a bit more taking note of your suggestions. | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 15:30 | comment | added | pacmaninbw♦ |
@einpoklum Mostly, but that would leave out the referenced variable s.
|
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 15:25 | comment | added | einpoklum | Don't you mean "Only include what is necessary"? | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:57 | comment | added | yyny |
Note that using a signed type instead of size_t will allow the compiler to optimize more aggressively, but it may also leads bugs. If you use an unsigned type for array/pointer indices, always use size_t. Also, don't optimize prematurely.
|
|
| Aug 1, 2020 at 21:04 | vote | accept | Ilian Zapryanov | ||
| Aug 1, 2020 at 21:03 | history | answered | pacmaninbw♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |