Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • This conflates several points. X being /essential/ to A neither means nor implies that X "flows from" A, whatever that means. Nor does X being /grounded/ in A mean that X is /internal/ to A; indeed, it is essential to distinguish between an instantiation of X being internal to A and the very meaning/definition of X being internal to A (again: whatever that means). So without distinguishing these points, this is not a "third answer," but simply an obscuration and verbal conflation of features of the two standard anwers. Commented Apr 1, 2025 at 0:54
  • None of this implies "platonic abstracta," of course, but simply ordinary distinctions between concepts and their instantiations. (N.b.: Michael16, you seem very prone to making unjustified slanders, both of your opponents and of many intellectual bystanders not even closely related to the original Q and your A; I'm not surprised that one of your responses, to which you protested on a meta-question, got deleted. You might want to stay more focused in your replies if you want to people to take you seriously.) Commented Apr 1, 2025 at 0:56