Timeline for answer to My thesis was published without my approval by Ben
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 days ago | history | edited | Ben | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Ben | @BryanKrause: Good point - I've edited to note that it may be necessary to add an erratum. | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | Ben | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 263 characters in body
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | I think this is mostly a good answer from a practical perspective, but OP also says "The dataset and analyses were handled incorrectly, and the published results are wrong and substantially different from my original findings". That seems to go a bit beyond a supervisor just polishing up some work for publication. Obviously more detailed info would be necessary to draw further judgment. | |
| 2 days ago | history | answered | Ben | CC BY-SA 4.0 |