Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 30, 2023 at 3:38 comment added user21820 Then I really don't see any problem at all. I do not know a single professional mathematician who would not want to be told as soon as possible of any apparent mistake. In fact, because of that I don't really think the two questions in your post are actually relevant to your situation (even though they would make a good question for other kinds of peer-reviews).
Mar 29, 2023 at 19:46 comment added Yanko @user21820 You guessed correctly, I believe I have found a mistake in their proof.
S Mar 28, 2023 at 18:32 history edited user137975 CC BY-SA 4.0
Redundancy, some wording changes to make more concise
S Mar 28, 2023 at 18:32 history suggested Hashim Aziz CC BY-SA 4.0
Redundancy
Mar 28, 2023 at 17:09 review Suggested edits
S Mar 28, 2023 at 18:32
Mar 28, 2023 at 9:19 comment added user21820 The good thing about mathematics is that the proofs are either valid or invalid, and no author wishes to publish an invalid proof, so it doesn't matter if you point out any flaws in their proofs. So at least in the aspect of correctness, reviewers don't have to worry about lack of anonymity. It would be best if you can be more explicit about what exactly you are concerned about that requires anonymity.
Mar 27, 2023 at 20:20 vote accept Yanko
Mar 27, 2023 at 14:38 answer added jakebeal timeline score: 10
Mar 27, 2023 at 8:15 history became hot network question
Mar 27, 2023 at 1:23 answer added Allure timeline score: 17
Mar 27, 2023 at 1:00 answer added Moishe Kohan timeline score: 37
Mar 27, 2023 at 0:34 history edited Anyon CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 9 characters in body; edited title
Mar 27, 2023 at 0:32 comment added Anyon Related: How do editors publish in their own journals?, Should an Editor in Chief publish in their own journal?
Mar 27, 2023 at 0:15 history asked Yanko CC BY-SA 4.0