Skip to main content

Timeline for Fastest Gun in the West Problem

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

88 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 18 at 23:28 comment added OutstandingBill Reputation doesn't really matter, when compared to health, paying rent, etc. (says someone with quite a low reputation, despite 39 years as a developer :) What matters is the visibility of useful answers. Short answers that convey enough information to solve the problem at hand are a lot easier to digest than long ones. Long answers can also be valuable, but in a different way.
May 11 at 1:57 comment added WGroleau @DouglasDaseeco, perhaps that's why I so often see "answers" that make me think the person did not actually read the question.
May 11 at 1:55 comment added WGroleau Almost every time I have posted a "short, simple, correct explanation," I've been immediately chastised for not including what I would consider obfuscatory verbosity.
Apr 8, 2021 at 13:23 comment added user718628 @Jonathan. replying to your first comment; don't you think this is sweeping the problem under the carpet?
S Nov 14, 2019 at 12:07 history rollback Omer van Kloeten
Rollback to Revision 12 - Edit approval overridden by post owner or moderator
Oct 17, 2019 at 23:26 history suggested user632840 CC BY-SA 4.0
removed deleted text
Oct 17, 2019 at 22:43 review Suggested edits
S Nov 14, 2019 at 12:07
Sep 3, 2019 at 12:12 answer added Danilo timeline score: -9
Feb 17, 2019 at 23:02 history rollback Nathan Tuggy
Rollback to Revision 10
Feb 17, 2019 at 22:18 history edited user380893
edited tags
Oct 25, 2018 at 16:06 comment added Owl It's an interesting problem. On the one hand people coming back to the site to understand a problem will upvote the best answer. So the best answer will get more votes overall. However the person asking a question is often >< close to missing a deadline and getting sacked, so for that chap, he wants the quick and dirty solution, not a protracted discourse of the whole life story and history of C++. So I don't think anything needs fixing here. There are necromancer medals on stackoverflow for a reason!
Aug 22, 2018 at 13:55 review Close votes
Aug 22, 2018 at 17:06
S Mar 9, 2018 at 7:47 history rollback Omer van Kloeten
Rollback to Revision 8 - Edit approval overridden by post owner or moderator
Mar 7, 2018 at 19:08 history suggested speedstyle CC BY-SA 3.0
The problem is not specific to SO; and 'despairs' doesn't make sense in this context.
Mar 7, 2018 at 17:41 review Suggested edits
S Mar 9, 2018 at 7:47
Oct 10, 2017 at 3:19 comment added Richard Chambers The problem with quick answer followed by edits that flesh out and elaborate the answer is that people are also quick to downvote an answer resulting in a quick, incomplete answer getting downvoted.
Jul 4, 2017 at 3:45 history edited John Militer
Edited tags
Mar 14, 2017 at 17:27 comment added Douglas Daseeco The rush to answer is because current scoring incentives are not temporally aware. The resulting dependence on the chronology of answers gives those who slight the question and rush to answer a statistical advantage. The skewing of reputation points based on temporal placement of events is a challenge in learning, the study of it, and the design of learning algorithms. The goal should be (to the degree possible) chronology independence. I tried to introduce that term here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/291364/…
Oct 31, 2016 at 19:47 comment added Bradley Thomas I posted a possible solution here meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/337187/…
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:29 history edited fi12 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Nov 8, 2015 at 21:51 comment added Mark Amery This answer was practically identical to the accepted answer to the same question, but posted 10 seconds later. The accepted answer got 838 upvotes; the linked answer got 8 upvotes. There's no way in hell that the 8300 rep difference between what those answerers earned is fair or represents the value of their contributions.
May 25, 2015 at 12:05 review Suggested edits
May 25, 2015 at 13:08
Oct 2, 2014 at 14:14 comment added Griffin I read the first two answers in descending score order (and their comments), then skimmed a bit more and grew weary of the topic. Are there great answers among the other 48 (as of now)? I don't expect I'll ever know. It's not in my nature to go hunting for under-appreciated answers, even though I've felt the sting of under-appreciation on S.O.
Feb 27, 2014 at 20:03 review Suggested edits
Feb 27, 2014 at 20:08
Feb 27, 2013 at 14:49 history edited cpast CC BY-SA 3.0
the "descending time" bit was important, and should be kept (even though it's no longer true, it should at most be struck out)
Feb 27, 2013 at 14:47 history edited John Kugelman CC BY-SA 3.0
no longer sorted by time of posting, removed that bit
Jan 9, 2013 at 13:46 comment added Ramy Al Zuhouri @Jonathan. But the answers should be sorted considering also the edits then.
Jan 9, 2013 at 13:28 comment added Jonathan. @RamyAlZuhouri, the time to click post and edit is insignificant compared to writing an answer that is long enough and thorough enough to need to click post and edit. (in other words if your in a hurry the answer your writing will be shorter and less thorough so you won't have to edit in the detail in steps anyway)
Jan 9, 2013 at 3:38 answer added Ramy Al Zuhouri timeline score: 4
Jan 9, 2013 at 3:33 comment added Ramy Al Zuhouri @Jonathan. That's still too bad, we're always in a hurry.
Sep 15, 2012 at 12:38 review Close votes
Sep 17, 2012 at 13:21
Sep 15, 2012 at 10:19 answer added Sahil Mahajan Mj timeline score: -10
Aug 8, 2011 at 5:13 history protected Jeff AtwoodStaffMod
S Jul 10, 2011 at 8:40 history suggested Flimzy CC BY-SA 3.0
Grammar police
Jul 10, 2011 at 8:38 review Suggested edits
S Jul 10, 2011 at 8:40
May 24, 2011 at 19:39 comment added Jonathan. create a quick answer, and then edit the detail in steps??
May 21, 2011 at 19:20 answer added TLP timeline score: -5
Dec 21, 2010 at 11:06 history edited This_is_NOT_a_forum CC BY-SA 2.5
added 36 characters in body; edited tags
Dec 13, 2010 at 17:40 answer added Brian M. Hunt timeline score: 2
Oct 6, 2010 at 17:04 answer added Lance Roberts timeline score: 1
May 13, 2010 at 18:41 answer added BlueRaja timeline score: 808
Dec 14, 2009 at 16:14 answer added bobobobo timeline score: 0
Jul 26, 2009 at 13:54 history edited Jeff AtwoodStaffMod CC BY-SA 2.5
edited tags; deleted 3610 characters in body
Jul 26, 2009 at 13:52 history migrated from stackoverflow.com (revisions)
Sep 12, 2008 at 6:46 answer added Peter timeline score: 8
Sep 12, 2008 at 6:11 answer added aku timeline score: 2
Sep 12, 2008 at 5:40 answer added helloandre timeline score: 4
Sep 12, 2008 at 2:38 answer added aku timeline score: 0
Sep 12, 2008 at 2:11 answer added Justin Standard timeline score: 317
Sep 11, 2008 at 23:57 answer added aku timeline score: 11
Sep 11, 2008 at 23:39 answer added quux timeline score: 102
Sep 11, 2008 at 20:44 answer added Wedge timeline score: 2
Sep 11, 2008 at 17:28 answer added Brettski timeline score: 4
Sep 11, 2008 at 15:09 answer added Apocalisp timeline score: 13
Sep 11, 2008 at 15:07 answer added harpo timeline score: 4
Sep 11, 2008 at 14:46 answer added Loofer timeline score: 43
Sep 11, 2008 at 14:25 answer added Tyler timeline score: 5
Sep 11, 2008 at 14:14 answer added Josef timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2008 at 14:09 answer added OwenP timeline score: 8
Sep 11, 2008 at 13:48 answer added Jason Cohen timeline score: 8
Sep 11, 2008 at 13:43 answer added Pollyanna timeline score: 391
Sep 11, 2008 at 13:16 answer added bruceatk timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:52 answer added aku timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:37 answer added Nick Pierpoint timeline score: 14
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:28 answer added Gulzar timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:28 answer added Gaius timeline score: 22
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:26 answer added Mel timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 12:04 answer added Martin Marconcini timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2008 at 11:53 answer added aku timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2008 at 11:50 answer added Omer van Kloeten timeline score: 19
Sep 11, 2008 at 11:41 answer added Unsliced timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2008 at 11:13 answer added Martin Marconcini timeline score: 11
Sep 11, 2008 at 10:53 answer added sdfx timeline score: 18
Sep 11, 2008 at 10:36 answer added Sam Hasler timeline score: 136
Sep 11, 2008 at 10:18 answer added macbirdie timeline score: 14
Sep 11, 2008 at 10:06 answer added Gishu timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 10:04 answer added David Schmitt timeline score: 2
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:59 answer added Christian Hagelid timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:59 answer added Vaibhav timeline score: 6
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:55 answer added Rik timeline score: 33
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:46 answer added Vinko Vrsalovic timeline score: 11
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:39 answer added tonylo timeline score: 15
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:30 answer added Mark Ingram timeline score: 4
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:27 answer added Bobby Jack timeline score: 19
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:22 answer added Galwegian timeline score: 11
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:20 answer added Mendelt timeline score: 52
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:18 answer added Chris Roberts timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2008 at 9:12 history asked Omer van Kloeten CC BY-SA 2.5